Shape Warning Pain

 

 

The conclusion of my 23 years work on low back pain is that there is a central unrecognized trigger or cause, which is:

 

that the lowest two discs                              and this fully flexed shape

should only flex between

this extended or standing

shape

 

 

In the flexed shape, the discs have not flexed beyond the parallel sides shape. In normal terms this is not a flexed shape for these discs. It is however the limit of their flexion  in this part of the human spine. Flexion beyond this will trigger the ‘shape warning pain’.

 

When either of these discs is able to flex beyond this flexed shape, to what might be looked upon as a normal flexed shape, a warning pain is triggered, which then sets up all sorts of muscle pains problems and ultimately damage.

 

More detailed explanations of the ‘Shape warning pain’ can be found in

 

Evolution of Low Back Pain (book)

 

Or

 

Evolution of Low Back Pain (one pager)

 

Return to Home page

 

Return to Alphabetical List

 

 

The following is an excerpt from the book “The Evolution of Low Back Pain”

 

 

It is the combination of this warning pain with the sublesations that it causes

that constitutes the typical episode of low back pain. When a long term low back

pain sufferer has a continuous ache in the low back from sitting or lying in bed,

the pain probably comes from the shape warning pain. Acute phases almost

certainly involve sublesations. It is probably worth trying to put together all the

characteristics of the shape warning pain. These are:

 

1) It applies at the lowest joints L4/5 and L5/S only.

 

2) These joints are normally wedge shaped wide end anteriorly and should not

flex beyond parallel sided.

 

3) The most likely source of the pain is the nerves in the posterior annulus -

particularly the postero-lateral corners. These nerves probably detect chemically

the proximity of the nucleus. This may however not be the case and it

may be shown that the source lies elsewhere. To help explanation, the

following characteristics will be explained assuming that this is the source.

 

4) Even when the pain level is very low, (only a slight .feeling.) the warning pain

can turn on sublesations.

 

5) When first triggered the ability to turn on sublesations is particularly strong

and these are very difficult to free up.

 

6) The pain can also be very severe when it first occurs and can take a long time

to die away.

 

7) Eventually in most cases the warning pain and its ability to switch on

sublesations both die away to a low level. Usually the tendency to turn on

sublesations persists more than the pain but in other cases sublesations

and spasms are rare and backache is continuous.

 

8) In this reduced state the warning pain usually only results in bouts of back

ache and the occasional brief episode of spasms and sublesations. In this case,

other factors which affect the whole body but have no direct connection with

back pain may activate the warning pain as a dull ache. These include

influensa, PMT, general tiredness, cold and draughts etc and stress and these

may appear to be .causing. low back pain.

 

9) After their initial .bout. some people suffer an ache in the low back due to

sitting/flexing/or lying in bed which can last persistently for a few days at a

time.

 

10) In some cases (possibly in a lot of cases) the shape can have been wrong from

childhood. In that case the phase of severe warning pain and sublesations will

not have occurred and the person will simply have a .weak. back with a

tendency to bouts of ache due to sitting, bending or lying in bed.

 

11) Usually this gets worse with age.

 

12) In any of these cases an actual injury, for instance in flexion when lifting, can

tear or crack the posterior disc annulus allowing general access by the nucleus

to the warning pain nerves and causing severe pain, many sublesations and

general spasms (and maybe a prolapse as well!).

 

13) After the initial bout of back pain the level of long term warning pain seems

to vary considerably. This assumes that any persistent sublesations have been

cleared either naturally or by osteopathy or chiropractic. In some people the

pain seems to drop to a level at which it is rare and acceptable whereas others

seem to spend a lifetime looking for chairs with adequate support to limit the

flexion and avoid a bout of backache. Whether this is a difference between

people or reflects the angle of flexion I do not know.

 

14) It seems to be the transition from not flexing beyond parallel sided to flexing

beyond parallel sided that causes the most severe pain and sublesations.

 

15) When it has been activated by this transition, the warning pain does not only

apply when flexed beyond parallel sided. It is usually worst on flexion but is

felt all the time. It is particularly severe on movement whether flexion or

extension. This is entirely compatible with the concept of fluid from the

nucleus being squeezed about in the area of the pain causing nerves. It is

frequently worst when trying to return to the fully extended shape. This is

also compatible with the idea of fluid from the nucleus being in the posterior

annulus near to the nerves. However if extension pressure is applied to

achieve the correct extended shape repetitively as suggested by McKenzie

then the pain can be almost immediately switched off in some cases. This too

is compatible with the idea of fluid being squeezed away from the posterior

annulus.

 

16) The warning pain is able to spread to appear as a referred pain in the sacroiliac

area, the buttock, thigh etc as sciatica (note: in most cases the symptoms

of sciatica are not caused by direct nerve root compression). This is a normal

characteristic of pain that it spreads in area as it become more severe e.g. heart

attack producing referred pain in arm etc. It is referred to by McKenzie

physiotherapists as .the centralisation/peripheralisation phenomenon..

Whether sublesations are responsible for this phenomenon or not I do not

know.

 

 

These points describe the characteristics of the warning pain and correspond very

well to the characteristics that one would expect from pain-causing nerves in the

posterior annulus which are sensitive to the presence of fluid from the nucleus.

(This does not prove that these nerves are responsible and the warning pain source

might of course be elsewhere). These characteristics together with the characteristics

of the muscle spasms caused by sublesations do also correspond to the known

characteristics of low back pain. I believe that this is strong evidence for this

interpretation.

 

 

 

Return to Home page

 

Return to Alphabetical List